[]

HUMAN AUTHORITY, IN MATTERS OF FAITH, REPUGNANT TO CHRISTIANITY: ILLUSTRATED IN TWO DISCOURSES ON MATTH. xxiii. 8.

WITH A PREFATORY ADDRESS, EXPLAINING THE PARTICULAR OCCASION OF OFFERING THEM TO THE PUBLIC.

BY THE AUTHOR OF AN ESSAY ON THE JUSTICE OF GOD.

"As the Church of Chriſt is the Kingdom of Chriſt, He himſelf is King: And in this it is implied, that He is himſelf the ſole Lawgiver to his Subjects:—He hath left behind, no viſibly human Authority, no Vice-gerents, who can be ſaid properly to ſupply his Place; no Interpreters, upon whom his Subjects are abſolutely to depend; no Judges over the Conſciences or Religion of his People.

"—They, who have other Lawgivers, and Judges in Chriſt's Religion, beſides Jeſus Chriſt—have ſet up to themſelves the Idol of an unintelligible Authority, both in Belief, and Worſhip, and Practice; in Words UNDER Jeſus Chriſt, but in Deed and in Truth OVER Him."

HOADLEY'S Sermon on the Nature of Chriſt's Kingdom.

LONDON: Printed for J. JOHNSON, No 72. in St. Paul's Church-Yard, MDCCLXXIV. [Price One Shilling and Six-pence.]

THE PREFATORY ADDRESS, &c.

[iii]

THE Author of the following Diſcourſes, hath been frequently accuſed of cheriſhing in his own breaſt, and labouring to diffuſe among others, a Spirit of enmity againſt the members of the Eſtabliſhed Church. But, this accuſation hath no other foundation than the ignorance, or the paſſions, of thoſe who have raiſed it. He can ſeriouſly, and truly avow, that he knoweth not what it is to wiſh Evil to any man, that he heartily wiſheth well to every one in the world. Others, alſo, can teſtify for him, that, next to the love of the Supreme Being, the adorable ſource of all Good; there are no doctrines which he ſo earneſtly and univerſally recommends, as an abhorrence of every ſpecies of perſecution, a candid and diſpaſſionate temper of mind towards thoſe who differ [iv] from us, and a generous, boundleſs, univerſal charity.

Is there, however, or, can there be, any kind of inconſiſtency between the ſincerity of this profeſſion, and a thorough diſlike to the mode of Religion as by law eſtabliſhed, with warm and repeated animadverſions upon the apprehended corruptions of it? May I not have an unqueſtionable good will for a Pagan, while I deteſt Idolatry as a diſgrace to man, and the higheſt inſult that can be offered againſt heaven? May I not be moſt affectionately diſpoſed towards a Papiſt, a Mahommedan, and a Jew; while I deſpiſe Popery and Mahomediſm, and would take every convenient opportunity of expoſing them as wicked impoſtures, and while I have not the moſt diſtant inclination to embrace Judaiſm? Churchmen, who, in the paroxiſms of their zeal, moſt violently declaim againſt the ſuppoſed hereſies of the Diſſenters, do not therefore I would hope, hate the Diſſenters themſelves; and there are Diſſenters, I am certain, who make no ſcruple to charge the Church with having adopted, and ſtill maintaining, the moſt childiſh, contradictory, [v] uncharitable and anti-chriſtian doctrines, who, notwithſtanding, entertain no antipathy againſt any Churchman on the face of the earth, but wiſh well to them all, and would, upon all occaſions, treat every individual of them, not only according to the laws of common civility, but alſo according to the ſtricteſt principles of humanity and brotherly love. One of the moſt benevolent of men, one who is known to cheriſh the moſt friendly diſpoſition towards the members of the Church, as well as towards all men, has repeatedly, however, charged the Church itſelf with the heinous and barbarous crime of Idolatry, beſides taxing it with a great variety of other follies, and abſurdities. Nor can I, after revolving again and again the matter in my own mind, ſee the leaſt reaſon why the moſt rigid Churchman ſhould take umbrage either at the boldneſs, or ſeverity, of this charge. If it be groundleſs, it reflects diſhonour only upon the Author, and is moſt eaſily refuted. If, on the contrary, it be well founded, we ſhould not degrade ourſelves by traducing the very firſt genius of the age, nor think that by vilifying him, we [vi] change the nature of things, but ſhould acknowledge that he deſerves the ſincere thanks of mankind, for his honeſt endeavours to enlighten, reform, and reclaim them to the pure worſhip of the only Living and True God. Let the matter then be coolly and fairly debated*. But, let thoſe champions who would refute the charge, and lead Dr. Prieſtley to the knowledge of the truth, be cautioned, not to take refuge in Church Authority, nor to divert our attention from the point in queſtion, by referring us to the opinions of Fathers, or Councils, [vii] nor to miſpend their time by deſcanting upon any topics whatever that are not clearly to the purpoſe. Let them firſt preciſely conſider the nature of Idolatry; and then ſhew the conſiſtency between the firſt, and great commandment, and thoſe addreſſes to Chriſt, and the Holy Ghoſt, which run thro' the book of Common Prayer. Let them particularly explain to us, how the true unitarian worſhip is contained in the following addreſſes, taken from the Litany, the Collect for Trinity Sunday, and the Communion Service.

‘'O God, the Father of Heaven, have mercy upon us, miſerable ſinners. O God, the Son, Redeemer of the world, have mercy upon us miſerable ſinners. O God the Holy Ghoſt, proceeding from the Father and the Son, have mercy upon us miſerable ſinners. O Holy, Bleſſed, and Glorious Trinity, three perſons, and one God, have mercy upon us, miſerable ſinners. Remember not, Lord, our ofnces, &c. Spare us, Good Lord.—Good Lord, deliver us.—By the myſtery of thy holy incarnation; by thy holy nativity and circumciſion; by thy baptiſm, faſting, and temptation; by thine agony, and [viii] bloody ſweat, by thy croſs, and paſſion; by thy precious death and burial; by thy glorious reſurrection, and aſcenſion; and by the coming of the Holy Ghoſt, &c*.'’

[ix] ‘'Almighty and Everlaſting God, who haſt given unto us thy ſervants Grace, by the confeſſion of a true faith, to acknowledge the glory of the Eternal Trinity, and in the power of the Divine Majeſty, to worſhip the Unity.*

‘'Glory be to God on high, and in earth peace, good will towards men. We praiſe thee, we bleſs thee, we worſhip thee, we give thanks to thee, for thy great glory, O Lord God, heavenly king, God the Father Almighty. O Lord, the Only-begotten Son, Jeſu Chriſt; O Lord God, Lamb of God, Son of the Father, that takeſt away the ſins of the world, have mercy upon [x] us, &c. For thou only art holy, thou only art the Lord, thou only, O Chriſt, with the Holy Ghoſt, art moſt high in the glory of God the Father*.'’

Beſides, it is well known that the clergy of the Eſtabliſhment take frequent opportunities of vindicating their principles, and of extolling their ſervice, as the moſt pure and perfect ſyſtem of religious worſhip under heaven, as, if not inſpired and infallible, approaching at leaſt as near to divine perfection as human abilities could poſſibly carry it. Nay, ſome of them, on one particular day of the year, not only take occaſion to revile the principles of all Diſſenters, but all Diſſenters themſelves; without making any kind of apology for their conduct, without ſuppoſing, indeed, that any is neceſſary, without imagining that they give juſt cauſe of offence to any one Diſſenter, but rather that they merit the thanks of them all. Why may not a Diſſenter, then, freely propoſe and [xi] vindicate, his own principles to Diſſenters? Why may not a Diſſenter, without harbouring a particle of enmity againſt any man in the world, declare, avow, and publiſh, what he apprehends to be the doctrines of Reaſon and Truth? Why may not a Diſſenter, while all the arguments that have been hitherto advanced in favour of Eſtabliſhments are inſufficient to work a conviction on his mind, ſincerely recommend, as well as practiſe, what he believes to be built upon the foundation of the prophets and apoſtles, Jeſus Chriſt himſelf being the Chief Corner Stone? Who is there indeed, has the leaſt right to take offence, at the undiſguiſed declarations of an honeſt man, who has truth alone for his object, and who recommends what he believes to be truth, not with the view of inſulting any individual, but only in the diſcharge of what he thinks his duty? Beſides, ſhould he be imagined to labour under a very diſcernible weakneſs of intellect, to have formed a wrong judgment, to be bewildered with inveterate prejudices, and to have entirely miſtaken the grand plan of the Goſpel, by what other method, but openly communicating his ſentiments to others, [xii] could he ſtand any fair chance, to have his underſtanding ſtrengthened, his erroneous opinions corrected, the thick darkneſs which envelops him diſperſed, and his reaſon fully enlightened?

I am certain, that I am neither knowingly nor willingly deceived; and that I would readily exchange my preſent ſentiments, for any others that could be ſhewn to have even the probability of being better founded. But, notwithſtanding this, I can embrace nothing as Truth, which does not appear ſuch to me. If ſtill, however, I am not able to diſcover or comprehend Truth, I can neither help my want of capacity, nor juſtly incur any blame for it. Thoſe, indeed, who would condemn me in this caſe, might as reaſonably condemn me for being either taller or ſhorter than themſelves, or for not being exactly ſimilar to them in features or complexion. In ſhort, I think any kind of apology for the following work, ſo far as the matter of diſcourſe may be inſinuated to require one, muſt be already anticipated by every candid mind, or by every perſon who would deal with others as he wiſhes to be treated himſelf. But, to thoſe who are yet diſpoſed to think [xiii] otherwiſe, I will frankly declare, in the words of an Author, whom I love to read, and whom I love to think of, that, ‘'The things, that ſeem to want an apology, are the doctrines of Original Sin, Predeſtination, Trinity in Unity, Satisfaction by vicarious puniſhments, &c. a Hierarchy, conſiſting of perſons, with names and powers altogether unknown in the New Teſtament: Eccleſiaſtical perſons, as ſuch, inveſted with Civil Power, contrary to the very genius of the religion of Jeſus Chriſt, whoſe kingdom was not of this world; Subſcriptions to Creeds, and Articles of Faith of human compoſition; the impoſition of ceremonies, by the authority of men in a Church, of which Chriſt alone is the Head*; and the enjoining of rites, which are the remains and badges of Popiſh Superſtition, ſuch as the wearing of a Surplice, the ſign of the Croſs, with Godfathers and Godmothers [xiv] in baptiſm; confirmation, by the impoſition of the hands of a biſhop; wheeling about to the Eaſt, and bowing at the name of Jeſus, as if it was a mere ſound that was worſhipped; the poſture of kneeling at the Lord's Supper, as it were, in adoration of the Elements of bread and wine, &c. &c. &c. Such as theſe are the things, that look, as if they wanted ſome apology; for, certainly, their reaſonableneſs is far from being evident at firſt ſight*.'’

Yet, on another account, I confeſs, ſome apology may be neceſſary. The doctrine which is here offered to the world, hath been already repeatedly, and moſt clearly illuſtrated, by men of the firſt rank for learning and genius. Why, then, it may be ſaid, ſhould I challenge the attention of my brethren, to that which has not even the claim of novelty to recommend it? The queſtion, I acknowledge, is by no means improper; and, therefore, I will give it the beſt anſwer I can. I would, firſt, obſerve, that every Republication of the plaineſt doctrine, in a different ſtyle and manner from that of [xv] preceding writers, may poſſibly be of conſiderable ſervice, to re-impreſs it upon our minds, and to make us renew our acquaintance with it, with freſh ſolicitude and ſucceſs*. What did not particularly ſtrike us at one time, may very forcibly ſtrike us at another, and lead to many unexpected and important enquiries. Beſides, the peculiarity of addreſs, belonging to any diſtinct writer, however uncouth and unpleaſing to the many, may yet happen exactly to ſuit a certain claſs of readers. As the moſt common ſcene of nature, muſt, when within their view, communicate greater ſatisfaction to ſhort-ſighted people, than the moſt enchanting diſtant proſpect, which their eyes cannot reach; ſo, to ſome perſons the ſimpleſt language will have its advantages above the moſt elevated. We are not all ſo conſtituted, as to reliſh the grateful odours of the moſt ſweet-ſcented flowers, or to diſcern the beauties of the fineſt, or to find much entertainment [xvi] among the greateſt variety. Some, again, will prefer the open lawn to the cultivated garden. Some will baſk under the piercing ſunbeams, rather than ſequeſter themſelves in the ſhady groves. Some delight in tumultuous cities; others, in the ſilent villages. Some climb the lofty mountains; others, can traverſe only the humble vale; and, while ſome have ſufficient fortitude and ſtrength to penetrate the bewildering foreſt, without being much alarmed or perplexed; others, have a thouſand difficulties to contend with, in travelling through the champaign country. In like manner, the metaphiſical ſubtleties, and ſublime eloquence of a profoundly learned philoſopher, may be wholly loſt upon perſons of inferior underſtanding, who will, yet, be much pleaſed and edified with plain language and unpoliſhed periods.

But, if any farther apology ſhould be deemed neceſſary for the publication of the following diſcourſes, there are ſome Diſſenters, whom it may poſſibly be a more arduous taſk to ſatisfy on this head than even the generality of rigid churchmen*. [xvii] Some Diſſenters, have ſuch a peculiar delicacy about them; others are ſo prudent; others again are ſo ſharp-ſighted in buſineſs, or ſo obſequious to faſhion, that a man becomes their enemy for telling them the Truth. The author is concerned to reflect, that he has had frequent proofs of this. Theſe diſcourſes, in particular, gave great, and almoſt univerſal offence, to a certain ſociety of Diſſenters, who would be thought to be poſſeſſed of liberal, candid, and enlarged principles*. They abuſed [xviii] the author, as a flaming incendiary, who meant to offer them an outrageous inſult, and to excite them to wage inceſſant war with the church; and they boaſted, with a peculiar ſelf-ſatisfaction, how generally the laugh circulated among them, while the diſcourſes were delivering.

They muſt ſurely be delighted, then, to receive entire from the preſs the ſubject of ſo much pleaſantry. As their memories are poſſibly not ſo perfect, but that ſome ſentiments, which they eagerly endeavour to recollect, may have eſcaped them, and as they would no doubt, fondly retain the particular obnoxious paſſages which ſo highly diſguſted them, that they may indulge their good-humour upon them afreſh, and likewiſe edify others by their remarks; he is willing, therefore to gratify them to the full, and to give them the beſt opportunity they can wiſh for of throwing confuſion upon his whole ſcheme. He is willing at any rate, for more reaſons than One, that they ſhould reconſider the matter. Particularly, as perſons often find fault with a ſpeaker, only becauſe they miſapprehend him, this publication may be of ſome uſe to prevent [xix] a miſrepreſentation of things, as it will empower thoſe, who did not hear it, to criticiſe upon it as preciſely and judiciouſly as thoſe who did.

But, whatever be the Event, ſhould the reſpectable ſociety he is ſpeaking of ſtill continue in the ſame ſentiments, and be able alſo clearly to convince him that he has totally miſtaken his ſubject, he ſhall, after all, expreſs his great ſurpriſe and aſtoniſhment, that they, as Diſſenters, ſhould have ſo little forbearance among them, or that they ſhould have been ſo vehemently irritated againſt him for what, in any view, can be called by no harſher name than the weakneſs of an honeſt zeal. His ſurpriſe and aſtoniſhment will continue to encreaſe, as he proceeds to reflect, what peculiar advantages this ſociety has enjoyed for a long ſeries of years paſt, under the miniſtry of a trulyapoſtolic teacher.

The Author muſt farther remark, that he thinks the Diſſenters here referred to have paid their acquaintance of the Eſtabliſhment but a coarſe kind of compliment, when they ſuppoſed that theſe would diſcover a high reſentment either [xx] againſt him, or againſt them, for the Freedom he uſed, that is, for vindicating, while he continues to think it right to ſeparate, his ſeparation from the Eſtabliſhment. We ſhould not ſuppoſe, without full evidence at leaſt, that the members of the Eſtabliſhment, would even wiſh to abridge us of the liberty of declaring our ſentiments without diſguiſe, or that they would refuſe to be upon the moſt friendly terms with us, becauſe we conſiſtently affirm that we believe them to be in the wrong, and ourſelves to be right. But, if they will unreaſonably be angry with us, we cannot help their diſpleaſure, nor ſhall it reduce us to ſilence*.

[xxi] My great remaining difficulty is, that the very perſons, who expreſſed ſo warm an indignation at theſe diſcourſes, acknowledged, at the ſame time, as I am informed, that every aſſertion contained in them was true. Will they avow, then, that truth is their abhorrence? Will they inſinuate, that truth is inimical to mankind? Will they pretend, that we ſhould be aſhamed of important truths, or that we ſhould only communicate them in ſecret? What ſentiments, upon this ſuppoſition, can they entertain of Jeſus Chriſt? He was Truth itſelf; truth came by him; he taught us nothing but truth; and he appeared to lead us into all truth. There ſeems, therefore, to be a high inſult offered to him, and very reproachful reflections caſt upon his conduct, when we reſent the declaration of known, or apprehended truths. For, upon the ſame principle, had we lived in his age, we would, as his kingdom was not of this [xxii] world, have treated him with as unrelenting ſeverity as he experienced from the Jews.

But, inſtead of minutely accounting for what appears to me to be a glaring contradiction in their conduct, I will now leave them to their own deliberations; after ſincerely aſſuring them, that, in whatever light they may be ſtill pleaſed to judge of me, they ſhall always enjoy my hearty good wiſhes.

HUMAN AUTHORITY, IN MATTERS OF FAITH, &c.
DISCOURSE THE FIRST.

[]
MATTH. XXIII. viii.‘ONE IS YOUR MASTER, EVEN CHRIST, AND ALL YE ARE BRETHREN.’

THE Goſpel precepts are remarkable, in general, for their ſimplicity. They come not recommended to us by the borrowed charms of eloquence, or by any of the embelliſhments of art, but, by what is of much greater importance, their own intrinſic excellence; and, as we would naturally expect, that the Great Governor of the world, when he condeſcendeth to reveal himſelf to man, would not ſuffer things of the utmoſt conſequence to be involved in obſcurity; we find accordingly, [2] that the more important any doctrine is, the more intelligible are the terms in which it is univerſally expreſſed. The way of duty, the way to happineſs, is always pointed out in ſuch legible characters, that he that runs may read. That allegiance alſo, which is required in ſpiritual things, is unfolded to us in the plaineſt language. But, to our great aſtoniſhment, thoſe very doctrines, in which ſophiſtry itſelf can diſcover no ambiguity, have been the moſt groſly perverted, the moſt preſumptuouſly and impiouſly oppoſed. But, without ſearching the ample page of hiſtory for a variety of particulars in proof of this; ſuch reflections, as offer themſelves to our conſideration from the words of the text, will be abundantly ſufficient to our purpoſe.

As an introduction to what I propoſe, it will be proper, firſt of all to obſerve, that the whole chapter abounds with ſome ſingularly affecting animadverſions, which our Lord had made upon the ſuperſtition, hypocriſy, and other vices of the Scribes and Phariſees. He gives us a ſummary view of their injuſtice, cruelty, oppreſſion, and uncharitableneſs; and ſtripping [3] them of all their artificial ſanctity, delineates their true characters in the moſt lively and expreſſive colours. ‘'They impoſed,'’ he ſays, ‘'heavy burthens upon others, by which they would not be bound themſelves. They pretended to be the moſt ſtrictly juſt and pious of men, at the ſame time that they devoured widows houſes: and, while they were ſo punctiliouſly exact in their attention to what was then a branch of the externals of religion, as to tithe ſuch things, as mint, aniſe, and cummin, they ſcandalouſly neglected thoſe weightier matters of the law, juſtice, mercy, and faith.'’

But, beſides a variety of other crimes, to which they were notoriouſly addicted, they compleated their infamy, by exerciſing an impious dominion over the conſciences of others. They claimed the power of preſcribing certain ceremonies; and ſhut up the kingdom of heaven againſt all opponents. With all the grimace of an affected ſuperlative holineſs, they compaſſed ſea and land, to make one proſelyte, when in their own hearts, there was nothing but ravening and wickedneſs. In ſhort, they laid a much greater [4] ſtreſs upon a devout attention to inſignificant forms, than in living up to the perfect rules of righteouſneſs and truth; and, as our Lord expreſſes it, ‘'They ſtrained at a gnat, and ſwallowed a camel.'’

It might be well expected, then, that a teacher ſent from God, would moſt cautiouſly guard his Diſciples againſt ſuch enormous corruptions; and that he would charge them, with a peculiar earneſtneſs, not to aſſume thoſe over-bearing principles of pride and ſuperiority which actuated their enemies, nor to form the moſt diſtant intention of founding a ſyſtem of religious ariſtocracy over one another. This had been the very fountain of all thoſe iniquities, which filled his pure mind with the utmoſt indignation and abhorrence. He, accordingly, thus ſolemnly addreſſeth himſelf to thoſe whom he had choſen out of the world, ‘'Be not ye called Rabbi, that is, Doctors, or ſpiritual guides; for one is your Maſter, even Chriſt, and all ye are brethren:'’ that is, all children of the ſame common, univerſal Father, and all, therefore, in religious matters, inveſted with exactly the ſame authority and [5] power. He could not have more fully expreſſed himſelf, if he had ſaid, I only am the way, the truth, and the life; thoſe doctrines, which I have received of my Father, are henceforth to be accounted the only true ſtandard of faith, and practice; by thoſe, therefore, you ſhould be governed here, becauſe by thoſe alone you ſhall be judged hereafter.

Had all thoſe, who have ever ſince profeſſed themſelves the followers of Jeſus, obſerved a due ſubmiſſion to theſe divine admonitions, we might now familiarize to our minds the various and complicated tranſactions of former times, with perpetually encreaſing pleaſure and delight; we might be able to read the hiſtories of a long ſucceſſion of paſt ages, without that degree of over-whelming horror which unavoidably riſes in the ſoul, at the view of that violence and barbarity which have been exerciſed upon the ſaints of the earth, who have been cruſaded, maſſacred, burnt, and torn in pieces, and that by thoſe who have impiouſly named the name of Chriſt, for no other cauſe whatever, than their honeſtly maintaining an inviolable allegiance to Chriſt.

[6] But we all know, that this Anti-chriſtian, and diabolical ſpirit, which formerly prevailed among the Scribes and Phariſees, was next adopted, in all it's aggravating circumſtances, by that mother of harlots and abominations of the earth, the church of Rome: and, we know the horrible, and unparrallelled inhumanities of this church, what fires ſhe hath kindled, what rivers of blood ſhe hath ſhed, what cities and towns ſhe hath laid in ruins, what extenſive provinces ſhe hath deſolated, and what thouſands of innocent victims ſhe hath butchered, in order to ſupport theſe helliſh claims. But, happy would it be for the world, unſpeakably happy, if we could name no other church which hath been partaker of her ſins. Happy would it be for the world, if the monſter of which we are here ſpeaking, was not ſtill living, beyond the boundaries of the Papal Empire, and blaſting the fair fruits of the bleſſed Goſpel, among thoſe who call themſelves Proteſtants. Happy would it be for us, if even in this enlightened land, there was now only one Maſter, even Chriſt. But, whatever pain and aſtoniſhment we muſt feel at the recital, [7] truth compels us to declare, that, whereever there is any Human Creed eſtabliſhed, there, there are more Maſters than One; there, there is an Authority diametrically oppoſite to the Authority of Chriſt, and fundamentally ſubverſive of it. This I propoſe to illuſtrate in the following Diſcourſes. It is evident, I think, indeed, from the words of the text thenſelves. For, when our Lord ſays, One is your Maſter, even Chriſt; he means as much as if he had affirmed, You have no ſpiritual juriſdiction at all one over the other;—Churches* are not your Maſter; mitred prieſts, or ghoſtly fathers are not your Maſter; Chriſt alone is your Maſter; and his laws are to be learned only from his own mouth, without the intervention of any human Authority whatever.

But, now, to eſtabliſh this doctrine upon the very beſt foundation, I ſhall endeavour to ſhew, in the firſt place, that Jeſus Chriſt had the unqueſtionable authority of heaven for aſſuming that diſtinguiſhing preheminence, which he here [8] claimed, namely, that of being our only infallible teacher of Religion, as the word Maſter, in this place, ſignifies; and, hence, it will be eaſy to ſhew the inconſiſtency, abſurdity, and impiety, of thoſe, who, by naming the name of Chriſt, moſt ſolemnly admit this doctrine, and yet, in every inſtance of their conduct, and with a ſhameleſs effrontery, act repugnant to it.

In the firſt place, I ſhall endeavour to ſhew, ‘'That Jeſus Chriſt had the unqueſtionable authority of heaven, for aſſuming that diſtinguiſhing preheminence which he here claimed, namely, that of being our only infallible teacher of Religion.'’ It is, undoubtedly, the ſole prerogative of the eternal Jehovah, to give laws to man. It is his prerogative, likewiſe, to communicate theſe laws, at what time, in what manner, by what ſanctions, and by what meſſengers he pleaſes; and, whenever, or by whomever, his wiſdom determines, either to re-publiſh and enlarge old laws, or to reveal new laws, it is our indiſpenſable duty to obey. But, then, we are not to receive, as Divine Laws, all doctrines, that are recommended to us as ſuch. For, this [9] would expoſe us to the moſt palpable contradictions, and to millions of impoſitions. On the contrary, becauſe we are required to ſubmit to the Divine Authority only, we ſhould firſt be aſſured, before we receive any doctrine, that it is Divine; and, this we can only know, by bringing the ſaid doctrine before the high tribunal of Reaſon. Reaſon, is unqueſtionably a Divine Law, written with indelible characters upon every human heart; and, as the peerleſs perfections of Almighty God will not admit even the thought, that he can contradict himſelf, or that he can give us contradictory laws; we may, therefore, conclude that no laws can be Divine, which are a contradiction to our Reaſon, or which are plainly repugnant to that ſenſe of Right and Wrong which is implanted in the ſoul, and which is another Divine Law. But, if, on the contrary, any doctrines that are recommended to us as Divine, be found to correſpond with the congenial ſentiments of our minds, and with the demonſtrable perfections of God in the univerſe around us, and are moreover confirmed by the moſt inconteſtable evidences of the Divine Power; then, we may reſt aſſured, that [10] theſe doctrines deſcended from above, from the Father of lights, and that the teacher of theſe doctrines, is the Sent of God.

Hence, then, it will clearly appear, that Jeſus Chriſt was the anointed Meſſenger of God, and fully commiſſioned, by him, to point out the way of Salvation to man. For, he taught us no doctrines that are contrary to our Reaſon, but ſuch as rather illuminate and perfect our Reaſon in the higheſt degree; and, he eſtabliſhed theſe very doctrines, not, as ignorance or malice have falſely aſſerted, by attempting to extinguiſh the light of Reaſon within us, but by the moſt ſolemn appeals to this primary law of God to man. What a wonderful contraſt do we diſcover between him, and all his pretended delegates, or vice-gerents and coadjutors upon earth! How proud are they? How humble was he! Without profeſſing the leaſt portion of his ſpirit, they have lorded it over God's heritage with a rod of iron. But, he, tho' the way to truth, and the life, tho' he ſpoke as never man ſpoke, and tho' God was always with him, and always taught him, did not yet require an implicit faith from any of his followers. He knew, on the [11] contrary, that one Divine Law, is beſt enforced and recommended by another Divine Law; and he, therefore, ſubmitted all his claims to the deciſions of Reaſon. He drew up no inexplicable ſyſtems of faith, for us to ſubſcribe, or to acquieſce in, in the room of works. The point that he laboured was to make men good, and not what the faſhion of the times had received as orthodox. In ſhort, he never addreſſed himſelf to the Jews, in the imperative tone of modern prieſts: ‘'Swallow down this myſtery, and the other myſtery; believe, tho' your own Reaſon demonſtrates the contrary, that Three are no more than One, and that One is as many as Three, elſe you ſhall have no peace in the other world, and I will give you as much trouble as I can in this.'’ No; he challenged them to examine his own pretenſions, according to thoſe very Scriptures in which they themſelves believed. Search the Scriptures, ſays he, for they be they that teſtify of me. He challenged them to accuſe him, if they could, of any ſingle tranſgreſſion of the Divine Laws. Which of you convinceth me of ſin? He challenged them to convict him of any falſhood, or to fix upon him [12] any expreſſions, or declarations, that were contrary to the moſt indubitable perfections of God. And, if I ſay the truth, why do ye not believe me? He challenged them to ſhew, that any one of his miracles could be effected by any other Power than that of Omnipotence. And, if I do not the works of my Father, believe me not: And, he challenged them to produce any arguments, why God would be with him in all that he did, if he had not come to do the will of God, and had not received his commiſſion immediately from God. The works which I do, in my Father's name, bear witneſs of me. A kingdom divided againſt itſelf cannot ſtand. And, if Satan caſt out Satan his kingdom cannot ſtand. But, if I by the Spirit of God, overwhelm the works of darkneſs, then is the kingdom of God come unto you.

All this, we muſt ſee, was ſound reaſoning, and demonſtrably proved, that Jeſus was the Son of God with power, that he came not of himſelf, that he ſpoke not of himſelf, that he did nothing of himſelf, but that whatever he did was by the power of the Higheſt. His holineſs, his wiſdom, his humility, his ſelf-denial, and his innumerable aſtoniſhing miracles, did [13] all proclaim him to be the well-beloved of the Father, full of grace and truth: and, the importance of his doctrines, and the benevolent ſcheme which he came to propoſe to the ſouls of men, call up our moſt earneſt attention to all that he did, and taught, and ſuffered for us.

He was holy, harmleſs, undefiled, and ſeparate from ſinners; the ſpotleſs lamb of God, without blemiſh, without guile, without a ſingle deflection from the ways of righteouſneſs and truth. All this, was fully characteriſtic of his heavenly origin. It is ſuch a one as he, whom we would naturally expect the Holy Majeſty of the Univerſe, and the Father of all mercies, to ſend into the world; one, who could no more betray us, by his example, than by his precepts; one, who was as amiable and lovely in his life, as in his doctrines; one, in whom virtue might be ſeen breathing celeſtial ſweetneſs; diſplaying a thouſand thouſand inexpreſſibly venerable charms, adorned with every grace, poſſeſſing every excellence and beauty, and ſuperior in glory to the ſplendor of the ſun, and the brightneſs of the firmament.

[14] But, the Wiſdom of Jeſus, is another demonſtrable proof of his divine miſſion. The people might well be aſtoniſhed at his doctrines; for they were ſuch as never had been taught before, ſuch as infinitely ſurpaſſed all the ſyſtems of the antient ſages. He carried morality to its higheſt purity and perfection; nothing now can be added to what he has ſaid upon it; and, after a trial of above ſeventeen hundred years, no exception can yet be made to a ſingle precept he has given. Beſides, he alone hath repreſented to us the perfections of the True God, in their native dignity and glory; leading us to conſider Him, as the One Spirit, and Univerſal Father, the only Omnipotent, the only Author of every good, whoſe Providence continually watcheth over the minuteſt works of his hands; and, he being the beſt judge of human nature, that ever appeared in our world, both, in delivering thoſe ſublime and unparrellelled doctrines, univerſally, and with an aſtoniſhing exactneſs, adapted his addreſs to the various characters of his audience; frequently drawing them to condemn their impious conduct, according to their own principles; and, afterwards, with irreſiſtible [15] force, in extempore parables, abounding with innumerable beauties, and ſuch as have never been equalled by any other ſon of man; beating down all the ſtrong holds of iniquity that ſtood before him, and majeſtically ſcattering the whole immenſe maſs of darkneſs which covered the world. Now, upon what other conceivable foundation is ſuch wiſdom to be accounted for, than by allowing him to have been a Divine Meſſenger? How is it poſſible to be accounted for, that the reputed ſon of a poor carpenter, untrained in the ſchools, without any of the aids of philoſophy, ſhould have been the wiſeſt of men, and the only infallible teacher of righteouſneſs and truth, unleſs he was taught of God, and ſent by him, to be the light of men? Could he, without either any divine or human aids, have been ſo ſingularly happy, as to have infinitely eclipſed in knowledge all the men who lived before and after him? Or would the God of all wiſdom and grace, have given him only an underſtanding to know the things that are excellent, had not he been under the conſtant influence of his good will and pleaſure?

[16] But, the humility and ſelf-denial of the bleſſed Jeſus, likewiſe demonſtrably prove him, to have been our heavenly appointed Maſter, or Teacher. Had he come to eſtabliſh ſome favourite ſcheme of his own, he would certainly have aimed at as much power and authority as he could prudently aſſume. He would have availed himſelf of the friendſhip of this world; and would have let no fair opportunity eſcape of fanning the fire of popular prejudices in his favour. But, he was meek and lowly of heart, and came not to be miniſtred unto, but to miniſter. He ſought not honour from men, but that which cometh from God only. Inſtead of aiming at temporal dominions, graſping at the ſceptre of univerſal empire, or climbing the ſummit of tranſient greatneſs, he chearfully offered himſelf to be the ſervant of all. He declared, in the moſt unequivocal language, that his kingdom was not of this world; and, that if we would ſtand candidates for his favour, or finally enter into the joy of our Lord, we muſt deny ourſelves, and take up our croſs daily, to follow him; and, he died as he lived, gloriouſly avowing the ſame ſentiments, [17] maintaining the ſame dignity, expreſſing the ſame contempt for all earthly poſſeſſions, diſcovering the ſame generous benevolence to man, and repoſing the ſame unlimited confidence in his God and Father.

Now, could all this have poſſibly happened, unleſs God had ſent him? Did any perſon ever yet eſpouſe a cauſe, that promiſed, and aimed at nothing, but poverty, contempt, and ſufferings, and die in the ſame without reluctance, unleſs he had full evidence, clear and irreſiſtible evidence, that this cauſe was the cauſe of God? The ſuppoſition is ridiculous, and a contradiction to itſelf. This argument alone, therefore, ſufficiently proves, that Jeſus had his authority from above; that the God of all wiſdom inſpired and taught him; and that he was divinely appointed to be our Maſter in Religion.

But, beſides the holineſs, the wiſdom, the humility, and ſelf-denial of our Lord; God alſo bore witneſs to him, by a ſucceſſive train of the moſt ſtupendous miracles; miracles which mere human art or power can no more accompliſh, than we can arreſt the ſun in its courſe, or create another ſun or another world. The tempeſtuous [18] ocean was inſtantly becalmed; lunatics were reſtored to their right mind; the deaf, the dumb, the lame, and the blind, loſt all their complaints, and the ſick all their diſeaſes, in a moment; and the dead were raiſed to life, only by his word, or touch; and, theſe things were not done in a corner, nor tranſacted in darkneſs, but in the face of day, and amidſt thouſands of ſpectators, and under the inſpection too of determined enemies.

But, laſt of all, God gave his omnipotent ſanction to all his claims, by making him victorious over death and the grave the third day after his crucifixion, and ſhortly after carrying him up viſibly into heaven, to give him the government of thrones and dominions, and principalities and powers. Hence, then, it is demonſtrable, that he was his well-beloved Son, in whom he was well-pleaſed; that he could have taught us nothing but the will of the moſt High God, ſince the moſt High God was always with him; and that he had, therefore, the moſt unqueſtionable Authority, for aſſuming and exerciſing the ſublime office of inſtructing all the children of men in the way of Salvation.

[19] This point, then, being once illuſtrated, it will clearly follow, that it is our indiſpenſable duty to ſubmit to him as our one maſter; and that the ſame deference and obedience are now due unto his Laws, as if they were immediately proclaimed to us from the lofty throne of God. ‘'For ſince he hath not ſpoken of himſelf, but that the Father, who ſent him, gave him a commandment what he ſhould ſay, and what he ſhould ſpeak; he therefore that believeth on him, believeth not on him, but on him that ſent him; and all, therefore, ſhould honour the Son even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son, ſince he was ſent by the Father, honoureth not the Father who ſent him*.'’ Hence, [20] then, we ſhould be taught, to pay the moſt ſolemn attention to every doctrine he hath revealed, leſt we, by the rejection of any, either through intereſt, or influence, [21] or luſt, or through any other motives whatever, ſhould be found fighting againſt God. Hence, again, we ſhould be particularly taught not to take any of theſe doctrines upon truſt, leſt they ſhould be diſguiſed or miſrepreſented to us; but, ſince they are not communicated to certain delegates to put what interpretation they pleaſe upon them, but graciouſly communicated to all men, to be perſuaded, each of us for himſelf, to examine ſeriouſly what they are, as they ſtand recorded in the Sacred Volume. Again, after they thus appear to us, in their full extent and native purity, all the honours and applauſes of men, all the riches and pleaſures of the world, and all the powers of earth and hell united, ſhould not prevail ſo much as the duſt of the balance to draw us from our duty. We ſhould be ſtedfaſt and immoveable in our adherence to them, in oppoſition to every enemy, and every temptation. We ſhould be ready even to lay down our lives in witneſſing a good confeſſion, for, it is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God, or to incur his ſovereign diſpleaſure by a negligent inattention, or obſtinate reſiſtance to his will. None [22] can deliver out of his hands, nor can any corner of the univerſe conceal us from his view, or place us beyond the reach of his power.

But, beſides the motive of eſcaping the folly and impiety of defying the Omnipotent wrath of God; or beſides the juſt apprehenſion that we ſhall appear guilty before God for pouring contempt upon his Ambaſſador; it is alſo to be conſidered, that Jeſus Chriſt recommends himſelf to us, as our moſt endearing and acceptable Maſter, by the importance of the doctrines which he taught, and the benevolence of the ſcheme, which he has propoſed to the ſouls of men. The doctrines he taught, are of the utmoſt importance to the peace and happineſs of the whole human race: they oppoſe all our deſtroying enemies, and are freedom, health, and joy to the mind. That we would love the Supreme Being with all the heart, and repoſe an unlimited confidence in his unceaſing bounty; theſe doctrines aggrandize the ſoul, and afford us infinite ſecurity and complacency in all circumſtances; and, that we would fly from all diſtraction and woe, from all the fears of jealouſy, from all the pains of [23] envy and diſcontent, and from all the bitterneſs of wrath and malice, by receiving and cheriſhing the heavenly bleſſings of temperance, chaſtity, truth, righteouſneſs, and brotherly love; theſe are the doctrines, which every man, who wiſheth well to human nature, would ſee univerſally taught and practiſed. Theſe are the doctrines, which every friend to man would wiſh to have uſhered into the world, by the moſt glorious diſplays of the Divine Power; and, theſe are the doctrines, which every friend to himſelf would cheriſh as his joy and crown, and perpetually obſerve and cultivate. For, nothing more is wanted to baniſh miſery out of the world; nothing more is wanted to plant ſweets in the deſart, and ſhelter us from all the ſtorms of life. Nothing more is wanted, to root up the briars and thorns, which ſo often weary and perplex us, and to make the whole earth a paradiſe of delights. That man is, therefore, the enemy of human nature, as well as his own tormentor, and a traitor to his God, who would oppoſe the progreſs of the Goſpel; who does not rejoice that Chriſt is our divinely appointed maſter; and who would not chearfully ſpend and [24] be ſpent, to bring all the ſons and daughters of men into ſubjection to his authority. But the benevolent ſcheme, which the Son of God has propoſed to our acceptance, is much greater than all this, goeth far beyond the line of time, graſpeth in its reach the utmoſt bounds of immenſe Eternity. For God was in Chriſt Jeſus reconciling the world to himſelf, gracious, forbearing, and long-ſuffering, not willing that any ſhould periſh, but that all ſhould come to repentance, and therefore communicating through him the glad tidings of Everlaſting Salvation to the whole body of his rational creatures here below; beſides providing in the beſt manner for their temporal happineſs, and inſtructing them how to overcome thoſe luſts that war againſt the ſoul; he was likewiſe pleaſed, in the adorable overflowings of his love, to hold out to their admiring view, the bright proſpect of endleſs life and endleſs bliſs. He was rich unto all that called upon him; and he granted to all a full remiſſion of all the ſins that were paſt and repented of; and, while he enlightened and refreſhed them with the moſt reviving precious promiſes of pardon, of a complete conqueſt over [25] death and the grave, and of an unfading future and eternal crown of glory; theſe wonderful communications of his love, were accompanied with the ſolid encouragements to caſt all our cares and burthens upon God, and to cry unto him in all our diſtreſſes, as our ever-preſent protector and friend; and theſe were likewiſe accompanied with the bleſſed aſſurances, that God will not ſuffer us to be tempted above what we are able, that he will never leave us nor forſake us while we perſevere in our duty, and that he will make all things work together for good to them that love him. In ſhort, the love of God in Chriſt Jeſus our Lord comprehendeth in it every thing that our ambitious hearts can wiſh or deſire, is amply ſufficient to employ all the wonder of the moſt enlarged faculties of the moſt capacious ſoul, and to ſatisfy us for ever. Nay, ‘'Eye hath not ſeen, nor ear heard, neither hath it entered into the heart of man to conceive the things, which God hath prepared for them that love him;'’ and to bring us to the poſſeſſion of which, he, of his infinite wiſdom and goodneſs, hath appointed Jeſus Chriſt to be our One Maſter, Example and Guide.

[26] How, then, ſhould we joy in God, through our Lord Jeſus Chriſt! What gratitude ſhould poſſeſs our hearts! What divine pleaſures ſhould fill our ſouls! With what unceaſing warmth of affection ſhould we look up to heaven, to reflect that ſo excellent a perſonage is appointed to reign over us, to ſave us from our ſins, to lead us to all truth, and to make us kings and prieſts unto God for Ever! There can be no greater ſalvation. The very thought of it ſhould make us break out into the loftieſt ſongs of adoration and praiſe. Indeed, every thing in the world ſhould be eſtimated as droſs and dung, when compared with this. We ſhould, therefore, hold this faſt. We ſhould ſell it for no price. We ſhould value it above all precious ſubſtance. It ſhould be dearer to us than our lives. In ſhort, we ſhould willingly relinquiſh every earthly comfort, and chearfully ſubmit to every earthly ſuffering, in maintaining our allegiance inviolable to our One Divinely-appointed Maſter, even Chriſt. For, How ſhall we eſcape if we neglect ſo great ſalvation? and, what ſhall it profit a man, if he ſhould gain the whole world, and loſe his own ſoul?

[27] Hence, then, let us be ſeriouſly perſuaded, humbly and joyfully to acquieſce in the authority of Chriſt, and to teſtify, through life, the moſt dutiful and ready compliance with all thoſe laws which he hath revealed. Let not, on the one hand, all the terrors of perſecution that can be raiſed againſt us; nor, on the other hand, all the accumulated honours that can be beſtowed upon us; and, much leſs, let the mode or faſhion of the times, which can only influence ſlaves, be able to turn us aſide from our obedience. But, conſidering our dignity and privileges, as the children of God, and the called to an inheritance, that is incorruptible and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reſerved in heaven for us, let us nobly, and triumphantly reſolve with the apoſtle Paul, ‘'that neither the world, nor death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things preſent, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, ſhall be able to ſeparate us from the love of God, which is in Chriſt Jeſus our Lord.’

But, having now ſhewn you, that Jeſus Chriſt had manifeſtly the high authority of heaven for claiming that diſtinguiſhed [28] preheminence which he aſſumed in the text, namely, that of being our One Maſter, or our only infallible teacher of Religion, and having, hence, clearly pointed out our duty and happineſs to be guided by him in the true way to Eternal life; our next enquiry will be, what is particularly implied in our acknowledging him as our One Maſter, our Only Maſter, and ſubmitting to him as ſuch. But, at preſent, our time will not permit us, to enter upon this part of our ſubject.

Let me, however, juſt expreſs my ſincere wiſhes, that, what hath been ſaid, may have a ſufficient force to bind us to our duty, to make us, in all circumſtances, approve ourſelves the genuine diſciples of Chriſt, aiming at whatever is good and acceptable to the Lord, and not caring what ſhall befall us in this life, ſo that we may finiſh our courſe with joy.

To this purpoſe, let us exerciſe ourſelves during the interval of ſocial worſhip, in preferring petitions to the Father of Lights, that he may guide us by his counſel, that all prejudice may be rooted out of our hearts, that we may know the Truth, and that the Truth may make us free.

Amen.

HUMAN AUTHORITY, IN MATTERS OF FAITH, &c.
DISCOURSE THE SECOND.

[29]
MATTH. XXIII. viii.‘ONE IS YOUR MASTER, EVEN CHRIST, AND ALL YE ARE BRETHREN.’

I HAVE endeavoured to ſhew, in the preceding Diſcourſe, that our Lord had the unqueſtionable authority of heaven for claiming that high and diſtinguiſhing preheminence which he here aſſumes, namely, that of being our one Maſter, or only infallible teacher of Religion. This appears, I obſerved, from all thoſe moſt illuſtrious virtues and heavenly graces, which compoſed his character; from that ſublime, and unparallelled knowledge which he poſſeſſed; and from [30] that Divine Power which univerſally upheld, and bore witneſs of him. His holineſs, his wiſdom, his humility, his ſelf-denial, and thoſe innumerable and aſtoniſhing miracles which he performed thro' the power of the Higheſt; together with the purity, benevolence, perfection, and importance of the doctrines which he taught, all demonſtrably evince, that he was the well-beloved of the Father, the choſen meſſenger of his ſalvation, full of grace and truth.

Hence, I obſerved, as the clear conſequence of this doctrine, that it is our indiſpenſable duty to ſubmit to his authority, and to pay the ſame deference and obedience to all his laws, as if they were now immediately proclaimed to us from the lofty throne of God.

But our duty being once obviouſly pointed out, it then becomes a matter of the greater importance. I ſhall therefore as was propoſed, in the next place, enquire at preſent, what is the full extent of this duty, or what is particularly implied in acknowledging Chriſt to be our one Maſter, and ſubmitting to him as ſuch; and, this evidently implies no leſs, than that we ſhould acknowledge no [31] other man, or body of men whatever, conſidered either as in competition with him, or in conjunction with him, to be our Maſter. The one Maſter ſignifies the one only Maſter. We accordingly find, that he had all authority committed to him by the Father, and that he is conſtituted the only Lawgiver and King in his Church; and, from this, it incontrovertibly follows, that we, as the true ſubjects of his kingdom, muſt, in a religious capacity, ſubmit to his Laws only. Theſe laws, it is again obvious to obſerve, are to be found in the Goſpel only. For this ſacred volume contains the whole doctrine of Chriſt, which was either taught by himſelf in perſon, or by his apoſtles, whom, after him, he commiſſioned to preach his name among all nations. Thou ſhalt not diminiſh aught from it; neither ſhall any thing be added to it.

Hence, then, we learn, in the firſt place, that every law of the Goſpel demands our full acquieſcence and obedience; but that every law, on the contrary, that is formed in oppoſition to the Goſpel, is a daring encroachment upon our native rights, a traiterous impoſition [32] upon our underſtandings, and an impious rebellion againſt God himſelf, becauſe a rebellion againſt the one Maſter, whom he has appointed.

Should any ſyſtem, or doctrine, therefore, by the wife and the learned, be now propoſed to us as a rule of faith, our firſt buſineſs is to enquire, whether this be the religion of Chriſt? If this be affirmed, we would then aſk, whether the thing propoſed be the Goſpel itſelf? If this be denied, on the contrary, we would ſay, that we have only one Maſter, even Chriſt. But, if we are again told, that, what is propoſed is a true ſummary of the Goſpel; we would, in this caſe, reply, that the Goſpel is its own beſt ſummary, that we have nothing to do with any other; that Chriſt has expreſſly taught us to ſearch the Scriptures, but never taught us, to take up with any pretended ſummary of them. But ſhould it farther be inſiſted on, that the thing propoſed is the doctrine of the True Church; we would then aſk, of what true church? Should it be anſwered, of the true chriſtian church; we would ſay, that the true chriſtian church has no rule of faith, but the naked Goſpel. Should we, however [33] be ſtill told, of the true chriſtian church, as eſtabliſhed by human laws; to this we would give in our teſtimony, that Chriſt's kingdom is not of this world, that he hath appointed no Sub-governors in his church, and that when one is of Paul, and one of Apollos, and one of Cephas, all theſe have ſo far withdrawn themſelves from the church of Chriſt. But, if it ſhould be ſaid, in the laſt place, that we are incompetent judges of the Scriptures, that the buſy part of mankind have not time to ſtudy them, nor capacities to underſtand them, and that, therefore, for the prevention of hereſy, there are certain holy officers appointed in God's church, and purpoſely trained up at the foot of the altar, and ſolemnly CALLED and conſecrated to deliver to us the true ſenſe of Scripture: all this, I would poſitively deny. Or, willing to do ſomething more than offer what may be called a bold aſſertion, I would argue in this manner; if there be, as is here pretended, any officers appointed in God's Church to deliver to us the true ſenſe of Scripture, let them produce their credentials, before they authoritatively require us to abide by their deciſions. God [34] can certainly bear witneſs of himſelf: and, if he has ſent theſe men, it may be expected that he will work miracles by them. But, on the contrary, if men have ſent them; or, if they of themſelves have aſſumed what they have not the leaſt ground of pretenſion to, let them return from whence they came; for, the Chriſtian has only one Maſter, even Chriſt.

Beſides, the pretence itſelf, that we are incompetent judges of the Scriptures, at leaſt ſo far as our ſalvation is concerned in the underſtanding them, is abſolutely without proof, not being warranted, in a ſingle inſtance, either by Chriſt, or by any of his apoſtles. Our Lord, on the contrary, addreſſeth himſelf to the underſtandings of men. For, If I do not the works of my Father, ſays he, believe me not *. The apoſtles, in like manner, ſuppoſed that we are all capable of reaſoning and determining for ourſelves. Why even of yourſelves, is their language, judge ye [35] not what is right? I ſpeak as unto wiſe men; judge ye what I ſay; and, truly, had the matter been otherwiſe, or, had men been taught implicitly to acquieſce in the dictates of their leaders, inſtead of being directed by their own enquiries after truth, there could never have been a chriſtian in the world.

But, ſtill farther, the authority in queſtion, namely, that of impoſing upon one another any particular ſenſe of Scripture, and calling ourſelves the Church, and then drawing up a rule of faith for others, which ignorance may invent, and power enforce under the pious ſanction of pains, impriſonment, &c. this authority, I ſay, which has always extended it's influence in proportion to the barbariſm of the age, is expreſſly, and moſt ſolemnly condemned, by the authority of Chriſt. He ſays, that we are all brethren, that we have, therefore, no authority over one another. He ſays, that we have only one Maſter. It is an act of treaſon, therefore, committed againſt him, to acknowledge any other Maſter; and, he ſays, that we ſhall not, as his followers we cannot, like the unenlightened Heathens, exerciſe [36] lordſhip or dominion over one another §; that, therefore, neither thoſe men, nor thoſe churches, that uſurp any kind of ſpiritual juriſdiction over our faith, can belong to his kingdom*. He has, moreover, inſtructed us, that we are to ſearch the Scriptures ourſelves, and not that others are to ſearch them for us .

[37] The apoſtles of Chriſt, likewiſe, charge every man to be fully perſuaded in his own mind, and to ſtand faſt in that liberty wherewith Chriſt has made us free. They, again, teach us, inſtead of ſubmitting, or ſubſcribing to any articles and confeſſions of faith, compoſed by weak and fallible, or, by proud and tyrannical men, to prove all things, and to hold faſt that which is beſt: and they pretend to commend themſelves to the conſciences of men, only by manifeſtation of the truth. They, farther, inſtead of calling themſelves our Spiritual Lords, or our Right Reverend, or Reverend Fathers, utterly diſclaim the being Lords over God's heritage, would only be eſteemed examples to the flock, helpers of their joy, and their brethren; and, once more, they inſtead of requiring an implicit faith from their followers, highly applauded the conduct of thoſe, who tried even their inſpired doctrines, according to the Divine Rule; and [38] thoſe of Berea, ſaid they, are more noble than thoſe of Theſſalonica, becauſe they ſearched the Scriptures, to ſee if thoſe things, thoſe things that were ſpoken by the apoſtles themſelves, were ſo, or not.

What ſhall we ſay, then, of the pretended ſucceſſors of the apoſtles, when they would deprive us of the liberty of ſearching the Scriptures? Arrogant and impious men! How dare they ſo much as name the name of Chriſt; and, yet, eſtabliſh, by violence, their own opinions, in oppoſition to the word of God, moſt explicitly revealed by Chriſt? Or, how dare they deny us the privileges of rational beings, who have the Candle of the Lord within us as well as themſelves, by affirming or inſinuating, that we muſt take their ſenſe of Scripture for the true ſenſe, and that we muſt neither judge nor think for ourſelves? Nay, grant them [39] but this ſingle point, and they as effectually rob us of the benefit of the Scriptures, as if we had no poſſible acceſs to them, or could never be permitted to ſee them but in an unknown tongue.

But, whether God is to be obeyed, rather than man, judge ye.

The Scriptures, are the great charter of heaven to every man; which we are required to examine for ourſelves, and of which we are required to judge for ourſelves. As they, therefore, demand our moſt cordial and grateful reception, we ſhould inviolably maintain the full poſſeſſion of them, and not, by neglecting to make that proper uſe of them which the Divine Being intended, ſpurn them from us as gifts not worth preſerving. But, while, without evidence, we ſubmit to that ſenſe of the Scriptures which has been affixed to them by men, we are then only the ſervants of men. On the contrary, while we ſeriouſly read, and judge for ourſelves, and are determined by that ſenſe of Scripture, which appears to the conviction of our own minds to be the true ſenſe of Scripture, we then ſubmit to the Divine Authority, and are the ſervants of Chriſt.

[40] Upon the whole, it is evident, that all human authority in matters of faith, is fundamentally ſubverſive of the Chriſtian Religion; and that all thoſe, therefore, are, ſo far, the enemies of Chriſt, who ſubmit to any ſuch authority, or who either directly, or indirectly, countenance any ſuch authority. When any men, therefore, or body of men, or, when any Church, pretend to claim, or exerciſe any ſuch Authority, to eſtabliſh any human Creeds, or Articles, or Confeſſions of Faith, we are warranted to conclude with the inſpired Addreſs, ‘'Come out from among them, O my people, and be ye ſeparate, and not partakers of their ſins.'’

But, ſecondly, we may advance a ſtep farther, and ſhew likewiſe, ‘'That all human authority in matters of faith, is abſolutely repugnant to the very nature of Religion itſelf.'’ Religion, is a conformity to the will of God, ariſing from his dominion over us, and all the obligations which we owe him. But, how are the opinions of men, to be regarded as his will? Theſe vary as much as our faces, and poſitively contradict one another; which his will cannot. Theſe [41] alſo contradict his will, when they contradict that law which is written in our hearts; for this law is his will. Thoſe, therefore, who, upon their own authority, would impoſe on us any particular ſtandard of faith, dethrone as much as in them lies the Divine Authority: and thoſe, again, who ſubmit to their authority, do ſo far diſclaim all loyalty to the King of Kings. Beſides; God is our Father. He himſelf hath ſhewn us what is good, and revealed to us the way of life. Our own breaſts, therefore, are our beſt monitors; and the Word of God our only guide*. It is to be conſidered, too, that he is poſſeſſed of all power, as well as of all wiſdom and goodneſs. His perfections, then, will not admit the thought, that he hath left our precious ſouls in the feeble hands of the Church, whether it be a Popiſh one, or an Epiſcopalian one, or a Preſbyterian one. Nor ſhall any of thoſe Creed and [42] Confeſſion-makers, therefore, perſuade us to be led blindfold to ſalvation, until they can firſt produce their commiſſion, clearly ſealed with the Seal of Heaven. Nay; If the blind lead the blind, both muſt fall into the ditch; and, to conclude this point, unleſs our religion be ſupported on a thorough conviction, and a deliberate choice, it can neither be a reaſonable ſervice, nor pleaſing nor acceptable to the God of Truth.

But, I would obſerve, in the third place, that ‘'All human Authority in matters of Faith, is a notorious departure from our original and avowed principles as Proteſtants?'’ I might conſiderably enlarge upon this head; but, beſides being precluded thro' the want of time, very few obſervations will be ſufficient to my purpoſe. We cannot, then, it is obvious, without the greateſt abſurdity, and the moſt glaring contradictions, claim that as our own right, which we oppoſe in the Church of Rome; for, that is certainly lawful in the Church of Rome, which is lawful in any other Church. But, was it not human Authority, in particular, that we firſt oppoſed in the Church of Rome? Was it [43] not entirely by human authority, that ſhe eſtabliſhed the moſt enormous ſuperſtitions, the moſt helliſh doctrines, and the moſt execrable impieties, that ever diſgraced the children of men? And, was it not, only for proteſting againſt human authority that the firſt Reformed were called Proteſtants? This cannot be denied. They nobly pleaded, that we have only one Maſter, even Chriſt. They ſolemnly proteſted againſt any other Maſter. They proteſted againſt the claims of any man, to preſcribe the terms of acceptance, or ſettle the faith of any other man. They proteſted againſt all perſecutions for conſcience ſake. They proteſted againſt the power, in any man, or in any men, of determining the ſenſe of the Word of God, for any other man, or men. They knew, that it was the uſurping of this power, which had overwhelmed the world with darkneſs, and deluged all Europe with the blood of the Saints of the earth; and they, therefore, juſtly conſidered all who exerciſed this power, as rebels againſt reaſon, apoſtates from Revelation, traitors to God, and deſtroyers of men.

[44] We, therefore, as Proteſtants, have eſpouſed the ſame principles, have enliſted in the ſame liberal, generous cauſe, the cauſe of humanity, the cauſe of truth, the cauſe of Jeſus, and the cauſe of God. But, if we build again the things we have deſtroyed, we make ourſelves tranſgreſſors. If we claim the right of exerciſing that very power, which we oppoſed in our enemies, we ſtand ſelf-condemned, we deſerve every meaſure of reproach and abhorrence, and ſhould be covered with ſhame and confuſion at the name by which we are called. But, if we, on the contrary, vindicate the glorious principles of Liberty, of pure, impartial Liberty, of neceſſary, reaſonable, divine Liberty; I ſay, of Liberty, not only to differ from the Creed of Rome, but likewiſe to reject every other Creed but the bleſſed Goſpel, and to form our ſentiments even of this, not according to the public voice, but according to every particular man's own reaſon and conſcience: if ſuch, my friends, be our principles, then may we rejoice, and glory in the name of Proteſtants; for, then, this will be only another name for Chriſtians; for thoſe, who are under the ſole influence [45] and authority of our one Divinely-appointed Maſter, even Chriſt.

But, once more, ‘'All human Authority in matters of Faith, is likewiſe diametrically repugnant to our original, and to our preſent avowed principles, as Proteſtant Diſſenters.'’ We ſtill continue to vindicate theſe principles, upon the very ſame foundation that we vindicate our ſeparation from the Church of Rome; and, certainly, as was hinted before, if we object to human authority in the Church of Rome, we muſt, to be conſiſtent with ourſelves, not to ſay, if we would profeſs a dutiful ſubjection to Chriſt, object to human authority, wherever elſe it be found.

Let us examine, then, a little, how the caſe ſtands between us. We know, that when King Henry the eighth threw off the Pope's ſupremacy, he laid claim to, and aſſumed, this ſupremacy himſelf. By denying the Pope to be our one Maſter, he did no honour to Chriſt, becauſe he, likewiſe, at the ſame time, denied Chriſt to be our one Maſter; and uſurping the unalienable authority of Chriſt, he declared himſelf to be our one Maſter. He, accordingly, publiſhed certain [46] articles of what he called Religion, which bear the ſame ſtamp of folly and blaſphemy with thoſe of other uncommiſſioned ſpiritual guides, and which whoever denied, or diſputed againſt, was to ſuffer death. Thus this deteſtable tyrant, this monſter of pride, iniquity, and luſt, made himſelf the abſolute Lord of the lives and conſciences of his paſſive ſubjects.

His lofty daughter Elizabeth, unhappily trod in her Father's ſteps. Tho' a ſufferer herſelf under her bloody ſiſter, ſtill ſhe retained ſo much of the ſpirit of her Father, and of that merciful church from which ſhe would be thought to ſeparate, as not to be able to learn the leſſon of mutual charity and forbearance, or to hear of the Goſpel precept of doing to others, as we would that they ſhould do unto us. But, as if ſhe had been the light of the world, or, as if God commanded an unlimited ſubmiſſion to her pleaſure, or, as if it was treaſon againſt her and againſt heaven, to affect to know more or leſs than ſhe knew, or not to worſhip exactly as ſhe did, let the conviction of any [47] perſons mind be what it would to the contrary; together with the anti-chriſtian Act of Supremacy, ſhe piouſly procured another Act, called, ‘'An Act for Uniformity of Common Prayers, and ſervice in the Church, and Adminiſtration of the Sacraments;'’ and beſides adopting, according to her Royal taſte, a multitude of Popiſh rites and ceremonies; ſhe likewiſe choſe to have her prieſts cloathed after the Popiſh model. She farther, erected a Court of High Commiſſion to enforce univerſal obedience to her commands; and ſhe puniſhed, or enlightened, all the refractory Non-conformiſts, with ſuſpenſion, impriſonment, fines, confiſcation of goods, baniſhment or death. Theſe wholeſome ſeverities, ſhe found had been practiſed by preceding princes; and were, no doubt, in her apprehenſion, eſſential to her monarchical dignity, and expreſſive of the tender concern of an affectionate mother for her untoward and undutiful children.

But hence happened that Separation from the Church, which has continued ever ſince, and which, while there are any ſuch things as reaſon and truth among men, will ever juſtify itſelf to the world. [48] Indeed, all that the Queen's officers could argue, was, that ‘'the things they impoſed were indifferent, that it was requiſite to order and decency to impoſe them, and that ſhe had, therefore, a right as Supreme Eccleſiaſtical Governor to impoſe them;'’ that is, ſhe had a right, by virtue of an office which could not poſſibly belong to her, to lord it over God's heritage, which very right it was death to aſcribe to the biſhop of Rome. But, our noble anceſtors, after ſeriouſly conſulting their own breaſts, and the Word of God, declared this right to be a violation of their Chriſtian Liberty. This liberty, they well obſerved, allowed not the impoſition of thoſe things, that were left indifferent in the Goſpel. They alſo objected their ſcruples of Conſcience to the uſe of the Veſtments, not becauſe they had any turpitude in themſelves, but becauſe they had been the uniform of Pagan and Popiſh prieſts, and might therefore be the means of ſtill ſupporting Pagan and Popiſh Superſtition. They affirmed, again, that weak Chriſtians ought not to be conſtrained to admit of indifferent things, when they think them unlawful; and, [49] they drew up a declaration, in ſubſtance to this effect, called, Reaſon grounded on Scripture: ‘'It is a dreadful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God, for doing that, which our own conſciences, informed by the Word of God, judge to be Evil: For, we would always keep in remembrance that alarming ſaying of St. John, If our conſcience condemn us, God is greater than our conſcience. We, therefore, chuſe to obey God rather than man; and to ſuffer, if it be the will of God, for an unſhaken attachment to his commandments, and to the dictates of our own conſciences, in oppoſition to the commandments of men.'’

Theſe were the ſentiments of our glorious forefathers. Theſe were the arguments, on which they formed and vindicated their ſeparation from the Eſtabliſhment; and, neither of theſe ſentiments, nor of theſe arguments, can we yet be aſhamed, unleſs we firſt renounce the principles of reaſon, of liberty, of truth, and of the Goſpel, unleſs we are dead to every ſpark of honour, generoſity, and greatneſs of mind; unleſs, indeed, we be aſhamed of Chriſt himſelf. It is, on the contrary, of the oppoſite principles [50] that we ought to be aſhamed; of the principles of pride and ambition, of ſlavery and darkneſs, of prieſtly dominion, implicit faith, and diabolical Antichriſtian tyranny. Of theſe we ought always to be aſhamed, as of what unman, and degrade us to a level with the beaſts of the field.

But, I would once more, and particularly, obſerve upon this point, that we do not, now, if we know any thing of our principles, or indeed if we have any principles of our own, profeſs to be directed any farther by the ſentiments of our forefathers than they were directed by Truth. We do not profeſs, even by regarding their example, to believe any one of their doctrines, or to embrace any one of their opinions, unleſs ſuch doctrines and opinions are in perfect harmony with our own Reaſon, and the Word of God. Nay; we profeſs to reject as freely any doctrines of our fore-fathers, or any of our own former doctrines, as the moſt obnoxious doctrines of Popery, if the ſame doctrines now appear to us Anti-chriſtian or abſurd. *In ſhort, we profeſs, [51] as Proteſtant Diſſenters, to have, in all our religious concerns, only One Maſter, even Chriſt. Or, to adopt the rational and ſpirited declaration of the celebrated Chillingworth—‘'The Bible, the Bible, is our only religion. To this every one of us ought to adhere; for by this every one of us ſhall be judged; and not according to the underſtanding, or obedience of any man or body of men, but according to our own underſtanding and obedience. What diligence and impartiality we uſe in learning our duty here, belongs not unto men to judge, but unto God.'’

[52] Upon the whole, I may now, I think, fairly conclude, that the moſt diſtant attempt to introduce any kind of human authority in matters of faith, is a moſt abominable deſpotiſm, repugnant to the very nature of religion itſelf, to the genius and groundwork of the chriſtian religion, to the dignity of reaſon, to the genuine principles of freedom, to the beſt intereſts of humanity, to the common Proteſtant cauſe, and to our avowed principles as Proteſtant Diſſenters. If, therefore, we have only One Maſter, away with all other Maſters; let none other, however famous for wiſdom, or rendered conſpicuous by ſounding titles of honour, have the dominion over us; and, what ſhould particularly and moſt powerfully induce us to regard the exhortation, is, that the more we examine the ſeveral ſyſtems that have been eſpouſed by that authority which we oppoſe, the more ſhall we find them all to have been of a piece with that authority itſelf. Whether we take up the Popiſh Manual, the Engliſh Thirty-nine Articles and Common Prayer, the Scotch Directory, the Augſbourg Confeſſion, the articles of Lutheraniſm, or the Inſtitutions of Calvin, we ſhall find in [53] them all ſome things that are equally irrational, impious and antichriſtian. It can, therefore, be nothing leſs than downright tyranny and blaſphemy, which eſtabliſh any ſuch authority, or which continue to ſupport it; and it can be nothing leſs than ſlavery and darkneſs which pay any ſubmiſſion to ſuch authority. But if there be thoſe, after all, who ſtill determine to ſubmit to human authority, we pretend not to be their judges. They are amenable to a future tribunal: and, according to their actions, according to the ſincerity and diligence they uſed in improving the talents committed to their truſt, they ſhall find their ſentence. Yet I cannot help obſerving, that, until they change their preſent conduct, they ſhould, to maintain a conſiſtent character, renounce the principles of Reaſon, reject the name of Proteſtants, and diſclaim all the priveleges of Chriſtians.

Let us, however, as members of a kingdom not of this world, reſolve to reject all thoſe doctrines of men, which tend to make void the doctrines of God. Let us firmly and deliberately reſolve to ſubmit only to our One Maſter, even Chriſt. But, as he was divinely authoriſed to communicate to [54] us the whole will of God, and nothing but the pure will of God, let us be perſuaded to attend to all his inſtructions as we regard our own Salvation. Let us, whenever we open the ſacred Volume, to be taught of him, conſider ourſelves as under the direction of God himſelf, becauſe he was taught of God; and let us, whenever his animating diſcourſes are read to us out of this Volume, hearken with that reverence which is due to the wiſdom of God. Again, let us conſider, that mere knowledge only puffeth up. Let us, therefore, while we are earneſtly endeavouring to treaſure up the doctrines of Chriſt, endeavour alſo, in our conduct, ſo to make our light ſhine amongſt men, that others ſeeing our good works, may be hence led, with us, to glorify our Father who is in Heaven.

The grand point is this. We ſhould ſet our affections upon the things that are above. Seeing that we look forward to a future incorruptible inheritance, this inheritance ſhould ever be our jewel of great price. We ſhould conſider in the ſame view, as the paſſing vapours, all the riches, and honours, and pleaſures, of this preſent tranſient ſcene. We ſhould [55] account nothing honourable, which does not reſpect the will of the Supreme Lawgiver. We ſhould eſteem nothing great or good, which is not a reſemblance of his moſt glorious perfections. We ſhould be endowed, therefore, with bowels of the moſt tender mercies to our fellow men. We ſhould be ſtrangers to all wrath, and malice, and envy, and evil-ſpeaking, and eſpecially to all cruelty, oppreſſion, and revenge. We ſhould love, as brethren, the whole human race; remembring that GOD IS LOVE, and that in this was the love of God manifeſted, that he gave us his Only-begotten, or his well-beloved Son, that whoever believeth in him might not periſh, but have Everlaſting life.

The mention of this life, is ſufficient to make us SHEW OURSELVES MEN. With ſuch an object in view, we can pronounce nothing very grievous that may befal us here. With ſuch an object in view, though all the terrors of our ſpiritual adverſaries are at the ſame time before our eyes, we ſhall be ſtedfaſt and immoveable, and always abounding in the work of the Lord. We ſhall not envy the high and mighty. We ſhall not be moved to neglect the leaſt [56] duty, by the tide of popular prejudices. Pomp and ſhew, will but little affect us. Truth will have more charms in it than all the world beſides. We will bluſh for thoſe, who triumph in their ſucceſsful ambition. We will ſit eaſy under the laughter of fools. We will pity the ſcorner; and, all the pride, reviling, and ridicule, to which we ſtand expoſed, ſhall not be able to touch us.

Beſides, that the world is againſt us, ſhould not greatly affect us, or rather ſhould give us no kind of pain or diſcouragement. The world was againſt our Lord; but the High and Lofty One, who inhabiteth Eternity was his refuge; and we, in like manner, if we follow his ſteps, ſhall be always ſecure under the arms of Omnipotence. The friendſhip of God, will always ſupport and refreſh us, will give light to our ſouls in the dark valley of the ſhadow of death, and, at laſt, deliver us from every Evil, and crown us with every good. His friendſhip, truly, is ſufficient to reconcile us to all circumſtances.

To know, likewiſe, that our inevitable allegiance to Him, brings troubles upon us, that we ſuffer for eſpouſing the Everlaſting [57] Laws of Righteouſneſs and Truth, inſtead of making us diſconſolate, muſt make us always happy. For, this is the nobleſt cauſe in the world. To vindicate ſuch a cauſe, places us among the firſt of human beings. To be caſt into dungeons for ſuch a cauſe, is a diſtinguiſhing honour. To finiſh our courſe upon the ſcaffold for ſuch a cauſe, is our greateſt glory. Nay; we mention, with a high veneration, thoſe heroes, who fall in battle fighting for their country. With a ſort of wonder and reverence, we rehearſe the name of Wolfe. But, what are ten thouſand ſuch to the great Captain of our Salvation! What are ten thouſand ſuch, even to any other man, who ſacrifices his Life in the cauſe of ſacred truth! The martyrs of Religious Liberty ſuffer for our deareſt privileges, and our beſt intereſts, for the cauſe of God, and the moſt important concerns of all mankind; and their names are written in Heaven, and ſhall be held in EVERLASTING REMEMBRANCE.

Appendix A ERRATA.

THE END.

Appendix B Juſt publiſhed,

[]

Printed for J. JOHNSON, No. 72, St. Paul's Church-yard.

Notes
*
The friends of Orthodoxy have been repeatedly invited to point out the errors of this Arch-heretic. They have been particularly called upon to enter into a diſcuſſion of the doctrine now under conſideration. But, they have all obſerved a profound ſilence, except one, who indeed cannot fairly rank among them, though he entered the liſts as their champion. This gentleman, however, has ſince acknowledged himſelf miſtaken. If there are other more penetrating geniuſes, who, as I have heard ſome of them pretend, can ſtill demonſtrate our obligations to join in the Athanaſian Worſhip, why are they backward in executing ſo good a work? Why are they not ſo charitably diſpoſed, as to condeſcend to inform the more ignorant? Or, if they find themſelves unequal to the taſk, why do they not renounce their claim to infallibility, and give up their favourite idol as indefenſible?
*
See the Litany. It is hard to ſay, what perplexities may not be removed by perſons really poſſeſſed of the Holy Ghoſt. This paſſage, however, is at preſent covered with ſuch confuſion and darkneſs, in the view of the unregenerate, that it ſeems neither above the dignity, nor below the humility of a Metropolitan to endeavour to explain it. As the greateſt men ſhould not wiſh to have their good evil-ſpoken of, and as thoſe who we are told have both received the Holy Ghoſt themſelves, and have the power alſo of conferring it upon others, can certainly, if our information be true, enable us to comprehend every thing that is agreeable to the word of truth, they ſhould condeſcend to open the blind eyes, was it only to prevent the ſtrange ideas which ſome may otherwiſe entertain of the Faith of Biſhops. Until we are thus enlightened, a man who rather means to pity than inſult them, may be diſpoſed to ſay that they have no certain object of religious worſhip, or that they worſhip they know not what. Here, in particular it might be ſaid, they firſt ſeem to believe, that there is One God, and Father of all, who is both able and willing to ſave; but, that they have no ſooner addreſſed themſelves to him, than they ſeem to diſtruſt either his power, or his mercy, and that they therefore addreſs themſelves to the Son, as if he only could or would have any compaſſion on them; but that, again, having done this, they ſeem inſtantly to loſe all confidence, both in the Father and in the Son, and apply themſelves, therefore, to the Holy Ghoſt as their only God. The obſerver might continue to remark, that when they had proceeded thus far in their worſhip, they appeared to be all confuſion again, and that not knowing whether the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Ghoſt was the True God, they called upon them all together, not to miſs the right object, and, in their extreme precipitation, deſcribed the One God as conſiſting of three Perſons. Then follows, it might be added, a ſtrange kind of incantation, as it would ſeem, to the Three Perſons, comprehended under the term Lord, which muſt ſhock ſuch as are not initiated into the myſteries, as it leads them to apprehend that the Athanaſians believe their God to have been a mortal man, &c. &c.
*
Collect for Trinity Sunday. This is myſtery with a witneſs. The happy adventurer, who ſucceeds in unfolding it, will certainly find out the Philoſopher's ſtone.
*
See the Communion Service. It is difficult to determine whether this, or the preceding paſſages are the moſt curious. But, perhaps, they will be ſhortly explained to ſilence the murmurings of Mr. Evanſon, and to convince the excellent Lindſey of the Error of his ways.
*
Such a church, I know, is aſſerted to be the Church of Chriſt. But, this ſeems to be a miſtake, as the Church of Chriſt has only one Head, and that Head is Chriſt; whereas this other Church, ſometimes acknowledges the Biſhops, and ſometimes the King and Parliament, to be its Head, or Heads.
*
See the Addreſs to Proteſtant Diſſenters, as ſuch.
*
‘'Some advantage may ariſe from the ſame things being ſaid in a different manner, and upon a different occaſion.'’ See Addreſs, &c. on the approaching Election of Members of Parliament, with reſpect to the ſtate of Public Liberty in general, and of American Affairs in particular.
*
The latter, however, need not plume themſelves on this account, whatever be the ſeverity, and narrow way of thinking of the former, ſtill Freedom is found with the Diſſenters alone. This very Freedom prevents their diſguiſing one anothers faults, and makes them drop all ceremony where they apprehend one another are to blame. On the contrary, there are thoſe of the Eſtabliſhment to be found, who, when they think the honour of their church is concerned, are ready to throw the mantle of oblivion over ten thouſand things, which, in themſelves, by no means pleaſe them; and whatever, in theory, be the boaſted freedom of many Churchmen, they can have no great cauſe of glorying while they are known to continue in their chains, and either have not inclination, or reſolution ſufficient to ſhake them off.
*
Some perſons have ſuggeſted, that the diſguſt conceived againſt theſe Diſcourſes was univerſal. But the author has the ſtrongeſt proofs to the contrary, as he knows ſeveral, who were both highly pleaſed with the ſentiments they contain, and with the freedom in which they were delivered.
*
Some perſons are forward to raiſe the cry of diſturbers of the peace againſt us, when we preſume to utter or recommend any ſentiments that deviate a little from thoſe of the multitude. But they ſhould learn, as the famous biſhop of Bangor expreſſed himſelf upon this ſubject, that, ‘'The peace of Chriſt's kingdom, is a manly and reaſonable peace; built upon Charity, and Love, and mutual forbearance, and receiving one another, as God receives us. As for any other peace; founded upon a ſubmiſſion of our Honeſty, as well as our Underſtandings; it is falſely ſo called. It is not the Peace of the Kingdom of Chriſt, but the Lethargy of it: and a ſleep unto Death, when his Subjects ſhall throw off their relation to Him; fix their ſubjection to Others; and even in caſes where they have a right to ſee, and where they think they ſee his Will otherwiſe, ſhall ſhut their eyes, and go blindfold at the Command of Others; becauſe thoſe Others are not pleaſed with their enquiries into the Will of their great Lord and Judge.'’
*
The Author refers to ſuch conſtitutions, as have been ſince called churches.
*
John 5, 23. [...]. Theſe words cannot poſſibly convey ſo abſurd and impious an idea, as that we ſhould conſider the Son upon an equality with the Father, or even that the Son ſhould become as high an object of our adoration. The word [...] never ſignifies aequaliter, equally, but quum, ſicut, inaſmuch as; and, the only rational conſtruction that can be put upon this celebrated paſſage, is, that all men ſhould honour the Son, if they really do honour the Father, or, if they would ſhew that they really honour the Father; and, thus our Lord fully explained it in the following words, when he ſays, He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father who hath ſent him. As if he had ſaid, by affirming that all men ſhould honour the Son, &c. I mean, that he that honoureth not the Son, &c. As he ſaid at another time; he that deſpiſed him, deſpiſeth not him, but him that ſent him. It was really the Father who was diſhonoured, when no regard was paid to the declarations of the Son. He acted under the authority of the Father; and he vindicated, not his own authority, (he claimed no authority of his own) but the authority of the Father. ‘'I can of my own ſelf, ſays he, in this very chapter, do nothing: as I hear, I judge—I ſeek not my own will, but the will of the Father who ſent me. If I bear witneſs of myſelf, my witneſs is not true. There is another, that beareth witneſs of me—the works which the Father has given me to finiſh, the ſame works that I do bear witneſs of me that the Father hath ſent me; and the Father himſelf, who hath ſent me, hath borne witneſs of me—I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not,'’ &c. How aſtoniſhing is it, then, that men can repreſent our Lord, as contradictorily claiming, in the ſame breath, what he had ſo repeatedly diſavowed and rejected, namely, thoſe Divine honours which belong to the Father only, or as teaching us, that we ſhould make no diſtinction between him who did nothing of himſelf, and him who did all things by him, and can do all things of himſelf, and that we ſhould render the ſame perſonal homage to the meſſenger of God, whoſe whole dependance was upon God, as to the Unchangeable and Everlaſting God himſelf.
*
A farther proof of this, among many others, is, that our Lord propoſed that his Goſpel ſhould be preached to the poor; ſignifying, that the poor and illiterate were competent judges of its contents, and that they ſhould judge of it for themſelves, independently of the explication of the rich and the learned.
§
What is here aſſerted, is an undeniably clear inference from the expreſs words of Chriſt, Matth. xx. 25, 28. Ye know, ſaid he, to the diſciples, that the princes of the Gentiles exerciſe dominion over them, and they that are great exerciſe authority upon them. But it ſhall not be ſo among you. See the whole context to this paſſage, as we find it related, from the 20th to the 28th verſes. See alſo, the parallel places, Mark x. 42. and Luke xxii. 25.
*
I would not, however, be underſtood to inſinuate, that none but the profeſſors of pure Chriſtianity will be ſaved. None but the diſhoneſt need dread the diſpleaſure of God. Beſides, there are many, who, in their moral conduct act up to the character of Chriſtians, whoſe profeſſion is Anti-chriſtian. Theſe, would certainly be more exalted characters, if, renouncing all inferior authority, they would put themſelves under the direction of Chriſt alone. But, they cannot conſiſtently call themſelves the true ſervants of Chriſt, while they ſubmit to any foreign juriſdiction.
John v. 39. Search the Scriptures; that is, Do you yourſelves ſearch the Scriptures for yourſelves; be your own judges what they ſay; and how not, like ſlaves, in what is ſubmitted to your own underſtandings, to the magiſterial deciſions of thoſe who would interpret them for you.
Paul peculiarly diſtinguiſhed himſelf in recommending theſe doctrines. The other apoſtles breathed the ſame ſpirit.
The Bereans, in the opinion of ſome of our modern Doctors, ſhould have ſubmitted to the deciſions of the Church, ſhould have humbly and dutifully acquieſced in the various gloſſes and commentaries of the Scribes and Phariſees, the legally appointed leaders of the national worſhip. But, they were ſuch heretics as to ſearch the Scriptures themſelves; and the apoſtles were ſuch heretics, as to applaud them for this very conduct.
*
Thoſe very men, who would impoſe upon us additional Creeds, &c. confeſs that the Scriptures contain the word and will of God. When at the ſame time, then, they will not allow the Goſpel to be a ſufficient guide to heaven, but preſume, as it were, to perfect it by their additions, Do they not moſt daringly, and impiouſly ſet themſelves above God?
*
Some Chriſtians ſeem to think, that it would reflect the greateſt reproach upon them, to become wiſer than their fathers, or wiſer even than themſelves when children. My father thought ſo; I was born, and educated ſo; therefore, &c. But that which really diſgraces man, is his making no progreſs in Divine knowledge, his taking things of the utmoſt importance upon truſt, and not endeavouring to improve that knowledge, as well as that eſtate, which he inherited from his anceſtors: and that which does honour to man, is not, the not changing his ſentiments or profeſſion, but his being open to conviction, and yielding to evidence. Beſides, it is an uncomfortable kind of dignity, which centers in ſuch a uniformity of conduct, as will not allow us to aſſert our freedom and independency, nor to remedy any Evils under which we groan. In ſhort, it is not ſhameful to have been in error, but to continue in error, and to refuſe to come out of darkneſs, when we are ſurrounded with light.
Distributed by the University of Oxford under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License